Deep Cleaning: A Costly Mistake in Controlling SARS-CoV-2 in the Built Environment
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has witnessed an unprecedented focus on cleaning and sanitization. Many organizations have implemented extensive deep cleaning protocols, believing that these measures are essential in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. While cleanliness is undeniably important, the reality is that deep cleaning—especially when misapplied—can lead to a costly misallocation of resources and a false sense of security.

SARS Covid-2

understanding SARS COV-2 TRANSMISSION:

SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, primarily spreads through respiratory droplets when an infected person coughs, sneezes, talks, or breathes. While it can survive on surfaces for varying periods, the risk of transmission via surfaces (fomites) is significantly lower compared to person-to-person contact. This critical distinction is often overlooked in the rush to implement deep cleaning protocols.

tHE ILLUSION OF DEEP CLEANING:

general cleaning
Screenshot letter
Download the whole letter here
Deep cleaning typically involves thorough cleaning of all  surfaces, often using harsh chemicals and specialized  equipment. However, the  effectiveness of this approach can be overstated. Here are several reasons why deep cleaning may not be the panacea many believe it to be:

1. limited impact on airborne transmission:

Given that airborne transmission is the primary route of infection, deep cleaning does little to address the more significant risks. High-quality ventilation and air filtration systems are far more effective in reducing airborne viral loads.

2. resource allocation:

The financial and labor resources invested in deep cleaning could be better spent on improving ventilation, implementing occupancy limits,  or providing personal protective equipment (PPE) for staff. These  strategies have a more direct impact on reducing transmission rates.

3. chemical risks:

The use of harsh cleaning chemicals can pose health risks to both cleaning staff and building occupants. Prolonged exposure can lead to  respiratory issues and skin irritations. Furthermore, some cleaning agents can create hazardous environments when mixed improperly.

4. Inconsistent application:

Deep cleaning can vary widely in execution and efficacy. Inconsistent practices may leave behind contaminated areas, undermining the very purpose of the cleaning effort. Relying solely on deep cleaning can  create a false sense of security, leading individuals to neglect other preventive measures.

a balanced approach:

To effectively control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in built environments, a more balanced and holistic approach is necessary. Here are some key recommendations:

1. prioritize ventilation:

Invest in upgrading HVAC systems, using HEPA filters, and ensuring proper airflow. Enhanced ventilation significantly reduces the concentration of airborne pathogens.

2. Regular cleaning protocols:

Instead of periodic deep cleaning, establish routine cleaning protocols focusing on high-touch surfaces, particularly in areas with high foot traffic. This can be complemented with disinfection where appropriate.

3. educate occupants and staff:

Foster a culture of hygiene through education. Encourage handwashing, mask-wearing, and staying home when sick. These measures can effectively reduce the risk of transmission.

4. monitor and adjust:

Regularly assess the effectiveness of your cleaning and prevention strategies. Flexibility and adaptability are crucial in responding to changing circumstances and emerging data about the virus.

5. seek profeSSIONAL guidance:

Collaborate with health and safety professionals to develop an evidence-based strategy that addresses the specific needs of your environment. This can help ensure resources are used effectively and safely.

conclusion:

While deep cleaning may feel like a comprehensive solution in the fight against SARS-CoV-2, relying on it as the primary strategy can lead to costly mistakes. By understanding the dynamics of viral transmission and adopting a more nuanced approach, we can allocate resources more effectively, improve safety, and ultimately reduce the risk of COVID-19 spread in our built environments. Balancing cleaning efforts with proper ventilation, education, and ongoing monitoring is key to navigating the post-pandemic world successfully.

more blogs:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *