In recent years, the pharmaceutical
landscape has been rocked by the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines,
particularly those produced by Moderna and Pfizer. While these vaccines have
played a crucial role in combating the pandemic, concerns have arisen about
potential long-term consequences and liabilities for these companies. As we
witness the aftermath of the tobacco industry’s controversial history, we can't
help but wonder: could Moderna and Pfizer be forced to pay out large
settlements in the future?

lessons from big tobacco
The tobacco industry has long been under
scrutiny for its deceptive marketing practices and the health consequences
associated with smoking. Legal battles have resulted in massive settlements, as
states and individuals seek accountability for the damages caused by tobacco
products. The similarities between the pharmaceutical and tobacco industries
raise important questions about the responsibility of drug manufacturers,
particularly when it comes to safety and transparency.
Just as tobacco companies downplayed the risks
associated with smoking, there are concerns that pharmaceutical giants may not
have fully disclosed the potential risks associated with their vaccines. As
more data emerges and long-term effects are studied, we may find that certain
risks were underestimated or overlooked entirely.

the role of dna fragments

One particularly alarming issue that has
been brought to light is the presence of DNA fragments in vaccine production.
While this is a common occurrence in many biological products, the concern lies
in whether these fragments could pose health risks. Critics argue that better
filtration methods could have minimized the presence of these fragments,
potentially reducing the likelihood of adverse reactions.
Had more rigorous protocols been implemented
during the production phase, including the filtration of DNA fragments, we
might be in a different scenario today. With the rapid pace at which vaccines
were developed and distributed, questions about manufacturing processes have
become more pronounced. If these concerns lead to significant health
repercussions down the line, we could see a wave of lawsuits reminiscent of
those faced by Big Tobacco.
potential legal remifications
effectiveness:
As public scrutiny increases and new data continues to emerge, Moderna and Pfizer may find themselves facing a barrage of legal challenges. Patients who experience adverse effects or long-term health issues related to the vaccines could pursue lawsuits, holding these companies accountable for their products. Just as tobacco companies were forced to reckon with their past, pharmaceutical giants may also find their day of reckoning approaching.
Regulatory bodies, too, may come under pressure to revisit their approval processes and standards for safety. This scrutiny could lead to new regulations aimed at preventing similar situations in the future, affecting how vaccines and other pharmaceuticals are developed and marketed.
a call for transparency
Moving forward, the pharmaceutical industry must prioritize transparency and open communication with the public. Just as consumers are now more informed about the dangers of tobacco, they deserve to have a clear understanding of the risks associated with vaccines and other medications. Companies must not only be held accountable for their products but also for the integrity of their manufacturing processes.
conclusion:
The future remains uncertain for Moderna, Pfizer, and the broader pharmaceutical industry. As we reflect on the lessons learned from the tobacco saga, it’s clear that accountability and transparency are vital. While vaccines have saved countless lives, the potential ramifications of their production processes could have lasting effects. It is crucial for both the public and regulators to remain vigilant, ensuring that the mistakes of the past are not repeated in the field of pharmaceuticals. The industry must be prepared to navigate the challenges ahead, or it may face the consequences of its choices, just as the tobacco giants did.
I personally was forced to take the shot or be excluded from being able to go to the rec centre to work out. My daughter, Kyleaha, now 12 freaked out when they tried to put the needle in her. I’m so glad she didn’t get this product injected into her.

Author: B. Kelly Crosby with his
12 year old daughter, Kyleaha